The damage 4 simple digits can do

While reading the article “How Apple and Amazon Security Flaws Led to My Epic Hacking”, my jaw was dropped to the ground the whole time. I had no idea how easy it is to for a hacker to ruin someones personal devices so easily. The most interesting line to me was, “The very four digits that Amazon considers unimportant enough to display in the clear on the Web are precisely the same ones that Apple considers secure enough to perform identity verification.‪” It’s essential that people like Mat Honan that have been hacked share their story with the public in order for us as a whole to become more aware and understanding of security policies and customer service.

It amazes me that people have this much time on their hands to hack into an innocent man’s digital life for no reason other than to get access to his Twitter account because he liked his username when I barely have time to get homework done! Identity theft is one of those things that I feel like will never happen to me but after reading this article, I’ve realized how vulnerable I am to hackers. Most of my accounts link to the same thing and I often use similar passwords and 4 digit numbers. Simply because I “haven’t felt like doing it” I have yet to sync my phone to my MacBook through iCloud and pictures from up to 4 years ago are stored only on my computer. Although Honan lost photos of the first year of his daughter’s life, he is considered to be one of the lucky ones that got hacked! His hackers could have done damage financially leading him into an even greater problem, however, the 19 year old hacker was compromising enough to explain to Honan exactly how he performed this and that his hope was to basically make a point to the customer service of companies in order for them to upgrade their security to overcome all hackers in the future.

Contradictions of “fair use”

After reading the articles and watching the videos, the same thing came to mind for all of them alike- infringement on copyright is obviously not taken as seriously as it should be from professors, students, scholars, or anyone else who uses work that is not their own. This however, seems to be mainly due to the fact that there is not a specific list as to what is fair use and what is not. In Dan Cohen’s Owning the Past: Fair Use quotes that in section 107 of the 1976 Copyright Act is is stated that “fair use of a copyrighted work … for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright”. Many people can and do take advantage of this and can say they are doing research, reporting, or criticizing when in reality, they are stealing someone else’s work and calling it their own and majority of people are able to get away with it since there is so many different rules and regulations regarding fair use.

Fair use strikes me as something that is almost assumed to be everything on the internet for students. I, for example, have never asked permission to use any type of source (digital, oral, written) because I was never required to do that as we are required to cite our sources in a bibliography. However, I found it interesting that some books have to be approved to even be in a bibliography. It was interesting though that just as one should be careful with fair use, it was also stated that one should not be too cautious and some, Chicago Manual for example, warns against seeking permission.

After reading this article, I feel like I’m more inclined to make absolute sure that what I am producing is fair use and could not get me sued in anyway!

Heavy Metal Umlaut Hacker

I watched the video about the heavy metal umlaut and found the part where the web page was defaced to be the most interesting (about 5 minutes in). Here Jon Udell showed a hacker editing this page at 11PM typing derogative sayings and someone cleaning it up within that very minute. Udell questioned whether it was the same person that vandalized it then fixed it but when he went back and checked, contrary to his disbelief that someone could actually be watching that page so closely, his suspicion proved to be wrong; a different user than the one publishing the demeaning sentences was cleaning the web page up and returning it to its original form that quickly.

Since this video was published in 2005, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at it now in 2012 and found that there were hundreds of changes that happened and the most recent one occurred 6 days ago! It’s amazing to me that this web page is still being edited to this day! I wasn’t aware that wikipedia pages were updated that often. There was probably three times as much information on this specific page and almost all of the original text is no longer there.

Here is a link to the present day wikipedia article now titled “Metal umlaut”:
Metal umlaut

Research Materials

My research question: How have beauty pageants (Miss America specifically) transitioned throughout history in terms of race, weight, gender, etc and why? Does this change lead to a positive or negative outcome?

The Politics of Sex, Beauty, and Race in America’s Most Famous Pageant

First Black Girl Wins Miss American Crown

There She Is.....Miss America! | 1925
Miss America contestants 1921

The first link is a book titled “There She Is, Miss America”:The Politics of Sex, Beauty, and Race in America’s Most Famous Pageant written by Elwood Watson and Darcy Martin. It explores the scandals, praises, and changes that have occurred throughout history in this pageant starting from the very first one up until present day. It was the first published book to critique the pageant therefore got a lot of criticism from contestants and pageant judges/supporters alike, however, I am confident this book holds the truth rather than sugar coating what goes on behind the scenes of Miss America.

The second link is an archive I found in George Mason’s database titled “First Black Girl Wins Miss American Crown” that was written in 1983 in The Times. I thought this article was interesting because most of society knows who Vanessa Williams is, however, most of us, including myself, do not know she was the first black woman crowned in the Miss America pageant! Even more interesting than that, the runner-up was also African American. Although this article doesn’t go into much detail, it is the shift that led many other women of different races, ethnicities, and cultures to compete despite the previous assumption that only traditional “white” women can compete/win.

The last two images are from Flickr Commons and they are pictures of the first Miss America winner, Margaret Gorman in 1921. She was first named Miss Washington DC until the year after they had another Miss Washington DC, therefore they changed her title to Miss America. In one photo she is shown with her dog and in the other with fellow contestants.

Haley Stover: Digitalization- for better or for worse?

“We don’t want to talk you out of digitizing the past, but rather encourage you to carefully weigh the problems and expenses against the benefits.”

In this Digital History document, the quote above stuck out to me because although it started off saying we don’t want to talk you out of digitalizing the past- that seems to be exactly what they are doing. I, however, am on the fence on this subject. I thought it was interesting that Pierre-Charles L’Enfant’s original plans for the city of Washington are so fragile that they cannot be physically handled but are on the Internet for any average Joe to examine. When I entered this subject into the search engine bar, the majority of links were written in third person rather than in L’Enfant’s own handwriting as it is in the Library of Congress. This particular transformation into digitalization lost some of its antiqueness and value when printed onto a web page rather than written in first person point of view on the original paper. Conversely, digitalizing this document now makes it possible, as stated before, for individuals to look at it since it can no longer be touched.

Digitalizing important pieces of history allows society to be informed and educated about topics that otherwise might have never been explored had they never been put on the web. L’Enfant’s document is only available in Washington DC and before being digitalized, could only been viewed by those who had the money, vehicle, and accessibility to visit the Library of Congress. Using myself as a prime example, I had no idea a document of this sorts even existed, nonetheless, had never heard of a man named L’Enfant until I read this document and did some minimal research. Digitalizing the past is an easier and faster way to do research without the tedious process of scanning through encyclopedias, traveling to different libraries, etc while still learning the facts.

On the other hand, I can see where this method gets sticky due to the immense amount of people that have access to update the Internet and provide false information on a subject. This however, can be easily avoided if one knows how to test the validity of a website and author and the correct way to conduct research, which is something I hope to learn on improving in this class!

History of the Internet-Week 2

Although I was skeptical about watching an animated video that described the history of the Internet, I was immediately intrigued. About two minutes in, I was fascinated that the Internet was conjured during the Cold War in 1957, however not actually acted upon successfully until 1970. This was interesting to me when described that the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency invented this communication tactic after the first Sputnik was released into space. It is amazing that this creation  has grown to be one of the most popular, if not the most in the near future, means of communication, social networking, education, etc.

Just as all other inventions during this time period, the United States and Soviet Union were fighting idealistically over not only who could produce the newest technology, but who would be the first to actually use these devices, such as nuclear weapons. In spite of this war being mainly between the US and USSR, England and France also built onto this conception, leading to the four major domains of the early Internet. These foundations that are now our modern Internet are the Arpanet, Rand (military), NPL (commercial), and Cyclades (scientific).